September 4, 2026
A federal watchdog investigation has found that former Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer violated multiple Department of Labor policies, used government resources for personal matters, regularly consumed alcohol while at work and presided over what investigators described as a “toxic, intimidating and humiliating” workplace.
The findings, released Thursday by the Labor Department's Office of Inspector General, provide the most detailed account yet of the conduct allegations that surrounded Chavez-DeRemer's departure from the Trump administration earlier this year.
Chavez-DeRemer resigned in April, becoming the third Cabinet official to leave President Donald Trump's second administration. She was scheduled to be interviewed by investigators shortly before her departure but ultimately did not participate in the interview. Her attorney has previously rejected the allegations and argued that the investigation did not establish that she broke any laws.
The report is significant not simply because of the allegations involving a former Cabinet secretary, but because many of the findings concern the use of public resources, workplace conduct and the responsibilities of senior government officials.
Federal Watchdog Found Six Areas of Policy Violations
The investigation examined a broad range of allegations involving Chavez-DeRemer and members of her senior staff.
Investigators concluded that her conduct was inconsistent with Labor Department standards in six areas, including workplace harassment, alcohol consumption on federal property, use of government resources for personal activities, travel practices and the handling of gifts.
The investigation relied on extensive evidence. According to reporting on the findings, investigators interviewed 53 current and former Labor Department employees and reviewed more than 500 documents, photographs and videos.
That evidence allowed investigators to compare accounts from employees with documentary records and other materials rather than relying solely on individual accusations.
The resulting picture was of a senior leadership structure in which employees said personal demands, inappropriate behavior and workplace intimidation had become recurring problems.
Investigators Say Alcohol Was Regularly Consumed at Work
One of the clearest policy findings involved alcohol.
The Inspector General concluded that Chavez-DeRemer and two senior aides regularly consumed and stored alcohol on federal property without the written authorization required by Labor Department policy.
Federal rules governing the department generally prohibit alcohol consumption on government premises unless an appropriate official-use exception has been granted in writing.
Investigators searched Labor Department security records and found no documentation showing that the required authorization had been issued during Chavez-DeRemer's tenure.
Witnesses also told investigators that Chavez-DeRemer and members of her staff drank during the workday and that some employees felt pressured to participate.
The issue therefore went beyond questions about an individual's drinking habits. The watchdog treated it as a question of whether senior officials were following rules governing federal property and workplace conduct.
Government Employees Were Used for Personal Tasks
The report also describes instances in which Labor Department employees allegedly performed personal tasks for Chavez-DeRemer during official working hours.
In one example, investigators found evidence that her personal aide and executive assistant were directed to travel to her home in a Labor Department vehicle to organize her bedroom closet.
Their reported tasks included arranging clothing, shoes and purses, as well as handling laundry and dry cleaning. Investigators reviewed photographic and video evidence documenting the completed work.
The allegation is important because federal employees and government vehicles are public resources.
When government staff are directed to perform private household work, the concern is not merely whether the assignment was appropriate workplace behavior. It also raises questions about whether taxpayers were effectively paying for personal services.
The Inspector General categorized such conduct as an abuse of position and misuse of government resources.
Personal Travel Was Mixed With Official Business
Investigators also examined Chavez-DeRemer's travel.
The report found that she violated department travel policies by combining official and personal travel, according to reporting on the investigation.
One episode described in the investigation involved travel to Oregon and a visit to a strip club. According to the report, Chavez-DeRemer directed a government security or transportation employee to give money to a performer.
When the employee initially resisted, the report says a member of the security detail instructed him to comply.
The incident became one of the more striking examples cited in the investigation because it involved government personnel being drawn into a private activity while they were performing official duties.
Investigators Examined Relationship With Security Aide
The Inspector General also investigated allegations concerning Chavez-DeRemer's relationship with a member of her security detail.
Investigators concluded that she maintained what they described as an “inappropriately close and unprofessional relationship” with the security aide.
However, an important distinction appears in the report: investigators did not obtain sufficient direct evidence to establish that the relationship was romantic or sexual.
The investigation instead relied on other evidence, including surveillance and hotel key-card records, to examine the extent of their contact during trips. Both Chavez-DeRemer and the security aide declined to participate in interviews with investigators.
That distinction matters because the watchdog's conclusion was about professional conduct, not a finding that a sexual relationship had been proven.
Employees Described a Hostile Workplace Culture
Perhaps the broadest finding involved the workplace itself.
More than three dozen employees interviewed during the investigation consistently described the environment as toxic, according to the Washington Post's reporting.
Employees described senior officials discussing their performance in front of colleagues, including comments about whether workers had cried.
Witnesses also accused Chavez-DeRemer and her aides of berating employees, threatening termination and creating an atmosphere in which workers were afraid to challenge senior officials.
The report further examined allegations that staffing decisions were influenced by physical appearance rather than professional qualifications.
For an agency responsible for enforcing federal labor protections, such findings carry particular significance. The Labor Department's institutional mission includes protecting workers from unlawful workplace practices, making allegations of abusive internal management especially damaging to public confidence.
What Happened After Chavez-DeRemer Resigned
Chavez-DeRemer resigned on April 20, one day before she was scheduled to be interviewed by the Inspector General's office.
After her resignation, her attorney declined to make her available for an interview. Her lawyer has previously argued that the allegations were distractions and attacks on her personal life and said the report confirmed that she had not violated any laws.
The watchdog investigation, however, was focused largely on compliance with department policies rather than determining whether criminal laws had been broken.
That distinction explains why a report can identify numerous policy violations without necessarily concluding that the former secretary committed a crime.
Since leaving the administration, Chavez-DeRemer has launched the American Workers First PAC, a Republican-aligned political organization.
Why the Report Matters for the Labor Department
The findings could have consequences beyond Chavez-DeRemer's individual reputation.
Federal agencies depend heavily on rules governing official travel, government property, employee responsibilities and workplace behavior. Senior officials are expected to establish the standards that other employees follow.
When a Cabinet official is accused of disregarding those standards, it can undermine morale inside an agency and raise questions about accountability at the highest levels.
The report also illustrates the role of Inspectors General in examining allegations involving executive-branch officials. Investigators can review records, interview employees and determine whether agency policies were followed even after an official has left office.
New Leadership Faces a Damaged Agency
Deputy Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling is now leading the department while awaiting Senate confirmation to become secretary, according to the Washington Post.
His challenge extends beyond filling a vacant Cabinet position.
The department must also address the internal culture described by investigators and reassure employees that workplace rules will be applied consistently, including to senior officials.
Rebuilding confidence may require clearer oversight of executive travel, government resources, workplace conduct and relationships between supervisors and employees.
The larger issue is whether the problems identified by the watchdog were limited to the former secretary's tenure or reflected broader weaknesses in management and accountability.
Report Draws a Clear Line Between Misconduct and Criminality
The Inspector General's findings are serious, but they should be understood precisely.
The report found multiple instances of conduct inconsistent with Labor Department policies and concluded that government resources had been improperly used. It also documented widespread employee complaints about the workplace environment.
At the same time, the investigation did not establish that Chavez-DeRemer had engaged in a sexual relationship with her security aide, and her attorney has maintained that she did not violate the law.
That distinction is central to understanding the report.
The allegations surrounding Chavez-DeRemer's tenure initially raised questions about personal misconduct. The completed investigation instead provides a much broader account: questions about management practices, public resources, official travel, alcohol policies and the treatment of employees.
The report therefore leaves the Labor Department with a difficult legacy to address — one involving not only the conduct of a former Cabinet secretary but also the institutional safeguards designed to prevent abuses of government authority.
Also read: Putin Hardens Ukraine War Stance After CIA Moscow Visit